In the previous parts of
this post, we
have presented
that the 1776 Declaration
of Independence and other
three
sequential Organic
Laws have established the American peoples’ right and
duty to self-govern, meaning,
to act side-by-side
to operate the government at
all levels; this is termed
the “republican form of government”.
We have presented that The
Constitution of the United States (which
prescribes
the duties of the Congress in
service to us people)
includes ten
Amendments, called the
Bill of Rights, that
secures
our sole
authority over our own God-endowed
rights, and, secures our
societal governing
power, which
rights and power
cannot be usurped
by
government office-holders.
The
Bill of Rights, when
operable in the entirety,
grounds the
presumption
of the non-authority of
government office-holders as
a starting point when
we communicate with them.
The “supreme Law of the
Land” (U. S. Constitution, Art. VI) pertains to the entirety of the
Bill of Rights. This section
of our
Part Three presents
that the Federal Reserve Act contains our
access to the
protection of the entire
Bill of Rights. Being
qualified to be protected by
the entire Bill of Rights protects
us from being
subject to the post
Civil War (1868)
14th Amendment to that
constitution. The
separate 14th
Amendment pertains to
persons who operate a public status,
and links
to only some
of the Bill of Rights; in
other words, it grounds a government officer’s presumption of the
non-authority of those
persons
to be the sole governor
of their societal
rights and
obligations.
The
hidden
Venetian-family
governors
of current-day bureaucrats rely
on the 14th Amendment because
it authorizes their
secular Birth registration scheme
(performed by hospital
staff-members after a 9-month
old baby separates from its
mother’s womb)
as
the means of being able to
place a commerce-based Lien
on peoples’
exercise of societal rights if
people bond their energy
with the Venetians’
currency–-being
currency within the Federal
Reserve System that they
established. The
Federal Reserve is not an
agency of our federal government.
People themselves
consent to activate
that Lien by
not utilizing the remedy from
it, accessed within
the Federal Reserve Act (“Fed
Act”). The
Lien is performance-based, the basis being that a social conduct
obligation exists to do or to not do something, or to pay something.
The
current court system’s officers and
municipal government officers
act on that
Lien, or their presumption
that such Lien is operable or
pertains to every human who they physically view.
The point being, no one can
view that
such Lien exists simply because a human exists.
We
now focus on the Fed Act in
terms of its constitutionality, and why the American
people’s remedy
from entering into the international jurisdiction of law, where
the Federal Reserve System operates, was
included in the Act.
As the Declaration
of Independence memorializes, our republican form of government
secures our private rights, on the premise that “Governments are
instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of
the Governed”. The key word here is consent. We move our
private interests with our energy. We energize the act of
observing, of learning or reasoning, and then of choosing to do or
not do something. To choose is to consent. We express the
energetic-substance of our Being through our direct actions, or in
the representative-medium of money. The Fed Act provides us access to
national money, currently in the form of United States Notes
as silver-backed money of exchange. People can also choose to
utilize the more familiar form of ‘money’, Federal Reserve Notes,
which is circulating global currency of account, like an IOU
circulating amongst the persons who use it, backed only by those
people who pledge their energy to the use of Federal Reserve
bankers to fund the operation of the form of government
within the Federal Reserve System. Such pledge of energy
causes people to become subject to the transacting rules of commerce,
such as statutes and ordinances legislated within the coordinated
territorial and commerce-based government jurisdictions that we’ve
referenced in Part Two of this post.
The remedy
provision of the Fed Act is found as its Section
16, codified as 12 United States Code, Section 411, which states:
“Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making
advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents
as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized.
The said notes shall be obligations of the United States and shall be
receivable by all national and member banks and Federal reserve banks
and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues. They shall be
redeemed in lawful money on demand at the Treasury Department of the
United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at
any Federal Reserve bank.” The key portions of this description
are: (1) the notes are issued only for making advances to Federal
reserve banks through agents and for no other purpose, and (2) the
notes are obligations of the United States … receivable for taxes
and other public dues, and (3) Federal reserve notes must be redeemed
in lawful money on demand … at any Federal Reserve bank. So what
that means is, one’s use of Federal reserve notes (FRNs) causes one
to be an individual member bank and its sole
operational agent, and, one is advanced such foreign
currency and must pay a user-fee for it–-usury–and the court
system and other internal governmental entities must receive FRNs to
satisfy one’s public dues (obligations
existing within the Federal Reserve System), and, one can
redeem FRNs for “lawful money” upon one’s demand made at any
Federal Reserve Bank (which all American banks and banking
institutions are).
Many people believe
that the Congress’s passage of the Fed Act was unconstitutional.
The truth is, everything the Congress has done since the Civil War
has been in breach of the trust that the American people repose in
that body. But that aside–-since our immediate and private remedy
from the Venetian’s attempted conquer of America’s nationality
via the bureaucracy of their monetarist empire is secured to us per
the Congress’s passage of the Fed Act–-court rulings prior to the
Civil War addressed the underlying matter of the constitutionality of
the federal government’s power to incorporate, even
pertaining to a central bank. Prior to that matter being taken up,
importantly, in the 1803 Marbury v Madison case the Supreme Court’s
Chief Justice John Marshall (a Federalist) established the principle
of ‘judicial review’ of the actions of the legislative and
executive components of the federal government. The constitution does
not explicitly provide such power, but provides that un-elected body
with only the power to compel an official of the other two components
to perform a duty.
That assumed
judicial power was exercised in 1819 when Chief Justice Marshall
wrote the opinion in McColloch v Maryland, holding that the Congress
had implied power to incorporate and establish a central bank
charter. The court characterized the power of Congress as being a
broad, comprehensive and rational authority over the subjects of
finance and currency derived from the aggregate powers in Article I
pertaining to fiscal controls, providing that laws were “necessary
and proper” for the execution of its powers. Because this ruling
would open the door to the Congress’s later delegation of its
fiscal responsibility over to foreign bankers, we
add that Chief Justice Marshall expressed what was
proper and what was improper. Beginning
with proper,
the ruling stated: “Let the
end be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the Constitution,
and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to
that end, which are not prohibited, but consist with the letter and
spirit of the Constitution”. Addressing what was improper,
which he directed to the States’ potential interference with the
means employed by the central government–-and here we can interject
Federal Reserve bankers in place of the States–-the ruling stated:
“To impose on it [Congress] the necessity of resorting to means
which it cannot control, which another Government may furnish or
withhold, would render its course precarious, the result of its
measure
uncertain,
and create a dependence on other Governments which might disappoint
its most important designs, and is incompatible with the language of
the Constitution”. The U. S. Supreme Court repeated its
approval of such power of the Congress in 1935, related to the
holding in Norman v Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co [case subject:
that ‘gold clauses’ in private contracts only secure payment in
money, not in gold as a commodity]. In pertinent part, the court held
that Congress is authorized to provide a sound and uniform paper
currency for the country and secure the benefit of it to the people
by appropriate legislation, quoting Veazie Bank v Fenno (1869). What
that U.S. Supreme Court in effect secured is that a “sound and
uniform paper currency” is sound only by being trusted as
sound by the American people as the benefit
secured to them by the Congress per the delegated power given to the
Congress. In other words, it is the people themselves who
secure / bond the soundness of paper currency. Importantly, the
Veazie case, also a U.S. Supreme Court case, additionally provides to
us that there can be no taxation of lawful money of
the United States, but that lawful money issued by a private
bank was taxable. Such private bank would be the future
Federal Reserve, functioning via its state member banks.
Another important
case, not specific to the Fed Act but pertaining to the processing of
the resulting Lien on peoples’ energy, is the 1842 Swift v Tyson
case. The holding in that case initiated the blending of law and
equity as to instruments of a general commercial nature
being properly the purview of the federal courts, not the state
courts [pre-Civil War state courts], under the general principles and
doctrines of commercial jurisprudence. Equity essentially
means fairness, and pertains to contracts or agreements. In 1938, the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure established one system for
processing both law and equity cases. Soon after, most states
abolished the procedural distinctions between (statutory) law and
equity cases. In federal courts and state courts all civil cases
now proceed in the same fashion, regardless of whether they involve
legal or equitable redress. That is because the courts are
administering the rights and obligations of those people
who trans-act together within the Federal Reserve System. Officers of
the current court system, who operate commercial
jurisprudence, do so from the presumption that all people
consent to transact energy exchanges in commerce. There are some
additional historic events that support this premise of presumption.
In 1863, during the
banker-instigated so-called Civil War, President Lincoln ordered
issuance of the Lieber Code (written by the historian and legal
scholar Francis Lieber) as instruction for the Union army to execute
warfare in a moral manner. The military was the authority that would
protect property in accordance with the laws and usages of war (an
international doctrine); the word ‘usages’ relates to title to
property. The effect was that the military held the title to all
property in abeyance, meaning in temporary suspension, until
such time that the people would resume civilian
self-governmental power over private and public property. In 1864 the
acting Congress amended the terms “state”, “States” and
“United States” to mean the territories and District of Columbia
(13 Stat. 223, 306, ch.173, sec. 182), per the Congress’s plenary
power; this describes the current-day base of the
Federal Reserve. In 1861, when the war began, under condition of
the emergency President Lincoln ordered specie-backed treasury notes,
commonly known as Greenbacks, to be printed. Such lawful money of
the United States satisfied government spending and the buying
power of consumers. Five days after the war ended in 1865, Lincoln
was assassinated. Also relevant is that, at that same time silver
was discovered in the West. The prospect of national
specie-backed paper money as the medium of exchange threatened the
(Venetian) bankers’ planned oligarchical-control of our post-war
government, because such control was based on gold internally
backing their ability to manipulate an international currency to
their benefit. So, in 1866, they caused the Congress to pass the
Contraction Act, which retired some of the silver-backed Greenbacks
from circulation. They could not eliminate the national money,
however, and what we know today as United States Notes are actually
Greenbacks that still circulate, but only within bank vaults. We’ll
present more about that in our Section C of this Part Three. The
bankers even caused the Congress to pass the Coinage Act in 1873, as
the means of demonizing the peoples’ use of silver. Gold coins were
pronounced as the only form of coin money.
In furtherance of
the bankers’ establishment of oligarchical control over the
American people, in 1878 (in the continuing absence of functional
civilian governments) our federal Municipal Government was
incorporated by the bankers as the District of Columbia municipal
corporation.
The U.S. constitution was adopted as the charter, by operation of the
1868 14th Amendment; the due process clause in that Amendment links
to the Bill of Rights but the rules of commerce control which
rights apply. In the same year (1878), the American Bar
Association was founded in Saratoga Springs, New York; associations
existed in all federally-franchised States by 1925. In our Section A
of this Part Three we present that attorneys are licensed (by the
Venetian families who own the Bar Associations) to attack American
vessels in international jurisdictions of law (individual vessels /
accounts named after singular people, established for the purpose of
people moving their energy pledged to the use of central bankers). In
our Part Two we reference the congressional passage of the 1851
Limited Liability Act that bought the rules of Admiralty Law onto
land as Maritime Law, revised by Congress in 1884 in relation to the
14th Amendment, revised in 1886 to extend to all debts and
liabilities applicable to the 1887 Interstate Commerce Act. We now
add that it was revised again in 1936 to include the central bankers’
debt-based currency. The Federal Reserve is a private Maritime
Limited Liability corporation. After the Federal Reserve System
was established, the Congress allowed state banks to close, which
gave the Fed bankers a monopoly position. The individualized vessels
the bankers established for the American people, in conjunction with
a municipal cestui que vie trust (which means a Trust of a Trust),
are the maritime vessels that attorneys are licensed to attack
in international jurisdictions of law.
In 1887 the Congress
also created the Interstate Commerce Commission, which initiated
Administrative Law (statutory codes made Public Policy by
federally-franchised State “lawmakers”) enforced in the courts as
administrative courts. When the Federal Reserve System was
re-chartered by President Roosevelt in 1933, the National Conference
of Governors was established. The governors pledged the good faith
and credit of the citizenry of their federally-franchised
States (States on paper) to stand as sureties for the debt of the
municipal US corporation (incorporated in1878). That is from where
current-day governors derive the authority to issue executive orders
that compel residents’ conduct; residents’ conduct is
usually compelled by the legislatures’ passage of bills that the
governors sign into administrative law that
the courts enforce in
conjunction with the States’ law-enforcement departments. In
1934, per passage of the Foreign Trade Zones Act, FDR signed over all
governmental service contracts to the bankers’ control.
The 1944 Bretton
Woods Agreement established
the International Monetary Fund, a system
of monetary management of the
rules for commercial and
financial relations among the United States, Canada, Western European
countries, and others.
The IMF chartered a new Trust Management Organization in France doing business as UNITED STATES, INC., and also took over control of State of State franchises and opened coordinating STATE OF STATE franchises (such as the “STATE OF MICHIGAN”). The latter form of human-energy control, activated when people energize the bankers’ currency, produces funding for the State of State military-style governing of human conduct per statutes passed as corporate public policy by ‘lawmakers’ (Legislatures). In 1952 the Uniform
Commercial Code was developed, to which all statutes of the US
franchised States must comply; the Attorneys General of the States
review all legislative bills for
compliance prior to their
inclusion into the States’
Public Policy. By 1971, all
States had revised their constitutions per
which the residents
authorized the utilization of Maritime Law codes in the
administrative courts.
In
our Part Three’s final Section C, we focus on the operation
of the Fed Act remedy
from being subjected to the
bankers’ scheme. By
exercising the remedy, we defeat the Venetian families’ empiricist
structure designed to capture our energy by capturing our minds.
We defeat it with our exercise of never-extinguished nationalism
derived from our original structuring of our state and federal level
government. That original structure is concisely explained in the "History Section B" accessed from the sidebar of this site.
