Parts One and Two of this post have presented that the 1776 Declaration of Independence is the first “Organic Law”, as termed by the Congress, followed by the three other sequential Laws, ending with The Constitution of the United States (fully ratified in 1791) that includes ten Amendments securing the people’s rights and powers that cannot be usurped by government office-holders. The foregoing is supported by the fact-based content of our "History Section A" and "History Section B" found on the sidebar of this site.
This Part Three is divided into three sections in order to break the length into a more readable format. Section A reveals the background of the Federal Reserve that is necessary to first comprehend in order to understand the reason why we must free ourselves from the unseen controllers of the Fed who have been attacking our societal interests. Section B focuses on the Federal Reserve Act itself, in terms of constitutionality and operation. Section C focuses on the act of freeing ourselves, provided right within the Federal Reserve Act, which qualifies us State Nationals to operate the Republican form of Government of every State in the national Union (see the U. S. Constitution at Article IV, Section 4) wherein we enjoy all the protections of the four Organic Laws that structure state and federal level governmental operations.
We begin with background facts about how the Federal Reserve System became instituted.
As we’ve presented in our Overview (Part One of this post), the Federal Reserve System operates under international maritime law, also called the ‘law merchant’. To be able to fully trust that this is true, we urge our Readers to view at least the first 10 minutes of this video (actually the seven minutes from the 3:09 – 10:09 mark), consisting of a text in the form of several slides. It’s an overview of the fascinating historic synopsis about the development of the oligarchical principle presented in this three-hour video titled “The Oligarchy - The Black Nobility - The Illuminati - The Synarchy”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWSQr0lFrq4 This links the Babylonian cult of Apollo to the Roman Empire, which was replaced by Venice as the center of a new world monetarist empire with immense maritime power under the secret control of powerful Venetian families (the Black Nobility, landed aristocrats) operating their interests as private banks. The Winged Lion of Babylon was their symbol. As one of the presenters in this video states, “Venice became the residence of Satan on earth”. Venice propagated its system not by conquer of land, but through its bureaucracy in the nationalities it conquered. The Venetian families transferred some of their functions to London when the American continent was discovered. Later, when the colonists began to internally control their own credit system, an idea that could spread into Europe, the Venetian families’ planned oligarchical control over all human energy on earth--through interlocking banking directorates, holding companies and off-shore banking empires, all camouflaged out of public view--became threatened. The families migration of operations to London brought in the Rothschild dynasty of financiers to carry out the families “capital flight’ operations–-the international deployment of mammoth sums of capital without the knowledge or supervision of governments. The King of England became indebted to the bankers. Bankers privatized England’s revenues and charged for their services. The King pledged the wool production as collateral, and then the sheep. Eventually the farmers, via debt-farming, went bankrupt and handed land over to the bankers. [Which is just what has occurred to the American people, via mortgages.] The British East India Company took over England to create the British Empire. By 1763, London became the new Venice. Switzerland became the banking haven.
Of importance to us Americans, continuing this Section of our post’s Part Three, was the establishment of the Bank of England in 1694. King William’s Lord Treasurer organized England’s first national debt on behalf of the Venetians. At the 2:17:56 mark in this recommended video, it presents “how the fondi operates” (a “fondo” being the collective interest of a Venetian family operating as a bank or insurance company, and fondi being a syndicate of families). The managers of a fondi developed a highly effective clearinghouse of policy and operations. As to more current times, their strategy called the “Global 2000”, developed in the mid 1960s, outlined how to take over the United States economy–-they would establish a Eurodollar market as a pool for foreign-held U.S. dollar obligations of over $1.5 trillion in a supranational financial market that would be beyond the reach of the U.S. government, and then delink the U.S. dollar from gold, which delinking did happened in 1971.
The Venetian families’ planned corporate takeover of national governments involved utilizing cash flow from the narcotics trade and controlling large commodity markets (such as sugar and coffee). In the video’s section on “Synarchy” (at the 2:44:36 mark) communism, actually fascism, was introduced by the families into their global control structure. These ‘illuminati’ families’ gnostic-cult belief centers on salvation being only obtainable through the most heinous of sins, which sins they have committed per their planned and ordered acts of enslaving, torturing, murdering, or starving and poisoning the people of earth or the ordering of people into economic austerity to reduce the population to the manageable status of ‘sheeple’. The word “corporation” is a fascist creation. It refers to corporative mentality–-“the inducing of a moral atmosphere among the producing classes, which is essential to making regulations effective, inserted into the legislative machinery of the State for increasing the legislative powers and heightening officers’ political and constitutional prestige”. Doesn’t this relate to the mentality of the current-day American corporate States’ officers, and (sadly) the mentality of a large portion of the American people?
In our American-government history synopsis referenced in our post’s Part Two (and our History Section B found on the sidebar of this site), we present how these bankers fomented the Civil War and then thwarted the peoples' reconstruction of civilian governments afterward by placing the organic States in a Trust they established to create their own corporate form of government. But the same Venetian-family backed bankers were also the cause of our Revolutionary War, due to their establishment of the 1694 Bank of England.
The establishment of the Bank of England was the root cause of the colonists’ decision to declare their independence. The King had imposed more and more taxes on the colonists in order for the King to pay the banking interest owed to Rothschild, agent of Venetian families. The colonists’ own internal script was banned by England’s 1764 Currency Act; no bills of credit were allowed for anything. The tax paid by the colonists had to be in gold. Even though that Act was reversed by the Parliament in 1773, which is why that matter was not included within the indictment portion of the Declaration of Independence, by then the seeds of independence had been sown.
After the colonists won independence, some of the prominent statesmen of the day, known as Federalists, pressed for a strong federal government and the creation of a national bank. Alexander Hamilton was chief amongst them, and served as the first United States Treasury secretary. He was born in the British West Indies, came to the United States when the Revolutionary War had begun, served as a military officer, and married into a wealthy family. After the war he advocated for the creation of a central bank, and did create the first one: the First Bank of the United States.
From this summation about Hamilton, provided by the current-day Federal Reserve, titled “The History of the Federal Reserve System”, it blatantly includes that “Hamilton learned about central banking at an early age, when he read about how the Bank of England provided liquid capital as a way to expand commerce, which helped Britain become a global trading power”. Was Hamilton thus educated or guided by agents of the Venetian families, or is this statement by the Fed an attempt to equate the form of the first national bank here to the Fed’s structure as the means to legitimize the structure? In any case, Hamilton’s idea of debt being an asset initiated the psychological acceptance of the wholly foreign bankers’ debt-based currency that exists today in the form of Federal Reserve Notes.
Thomas Jefferson opposed the creation of a national bank on the premise that it would create a financial monopoly that would undermine state banks and adopt policies that favored financiers and merchants who tended to be creditors, over family farmers who tended to be debtors. Jefferson also argued that the Constitution did not grant the government the authority to establish corporations, including a national bank. Hamilton argued that the Constitution’s “necessary and proper” clause implied that the Congress had the power to create a national bank if needed, and that the new republic lacked a central institution to expand the money supply, extend credit, collect taxes, pay the nation’s debts, handle foreign exchange and store the government’s money, according to this summation (which is the link within the previous link about Hamilton). Despite opposing voices, Hamilton’s proposed National Bank Act cleared the House and Senate, and President Washington signed it, creating the first national bank in late 1791 with a twenty-year charter that would expire in 1811. In 1819, Chief Justice John Marshall (who was also a Federalist) ruled that the Congress did have implied power to create a national bank charter. We provide some more court-based information about that in Section B of this Part Three.
The charter of the First Bank of the United States was not renewed. Many of its initial investors were foreign, and what was not known by the American people was that those investors were under Venetian families’ secret control. The fact that there were foreign investors did not sit well with the American people. The U.S. government, the largest shareholder, did not directly manage the bank. By controlling the money supply available to state banks for loaning to people, and controlling the level of interest rate charged to borrowers, the national bank indirectly conducted monetary policy (which the Federal Reserve does overtly today). For four years proponents tried to obtain the vote to renew the bank’s charter, but Hamilton was dead, and his pro-Bank Federalist Party was out of power. By 1811 the number of state banks had increased greatly and those institutions feared the national bank’s competition and power. The renewal failed by one vote.
This link (from the same Fed source) provides insight into the creation of the Second (central) Bank of the United States. This event ties into the War of 1812 and the behind-the-scenes influence of Venetian banking families’ oligarchical strategies. The first related event occurred in 1811, when the original 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was proposed. That Amendment prohibited anyone owing foreign allegiance from holding a public Office; it was ratified by the requisite number of the existing States in 1819 but would pertain only to the government established by our four founding Organic Laws, not to the corporate structure criminally instituted by foreign bankers after the Civil War. The other background event occurred in 1794, the Treaty of Westminster between Britain’s City State of Westminster and the Crown Temple (ecclesiastical court). It pledged amity for commerce and navigation in perpetuity with the newly formed United States of America. When the charter of the first central bank here was not renewed in 1811, the Venetian families’ strategy was undermined. So Britain began to undermine the U.S. economy, which is standard practice to cause a war per which a targeted nation would go into debt. Britain used its navy to blockade U.S. trade with other nations, which had the desired effect of causing U.S. debt because of dependency on revenue derived from tariffs on such trade. The War of 1812 was a conflict fought over British violations of U.S. maritime rights. It ended in a draw, with the exchange of ratifications per the Treaty of Ghent. But during the war, the White House was burned by the British (or hired agents of the Venetians) for the purpose of destroying the 13th Amendment and our government’s founding documents; the attempt failed. The plan to establish a second central bank was then advanced by the Venetian families’ recruited prominent families within the United States, such as John Jacob Astor and others. These recruited families, as lenders and financiers themselves, petitioned for a national bank that would restore a stable currency and insure their business interests. President James Madison, who had opposed the creation of the first national bank, admitted the need for a second one for financing the war with Britain, but when peace came in 1815, it was Congress that rejected new efforts to create the bank. Once again, however, the federal government’s financial position deteriorated amid a broader economic turndown. Only when state banks had stopped redeeming their notes did President Madison succumb to the bank proponents and sign an act in 1816 to establish the Second Bank of the United States with a twenty-year charter, which charter allowed the substantial involvement of foreign investors. A subsequent change in the Bank’s presidency included policies that led to a depression, characterized by deflation and high unemployment. One such policy drove state-chartered financial institutions into bankruptcy–-the national bank had presented state banknotes for specie, and they lacked the specie to cover the redemptions.
We must interject here another foreign event of critical significance to the United States–-the 1822 Treaty of Verona, which violated the Treaty of Westminster. This treaty was between the British Monarch and the then Pope. It declared the (United States) representative form of government incompatible with the Divine Right of Kings and with Papal Supremacy. This allowed the Monarch to issue Letters of Marque and Reprisal to members of the Bar Association (a British Crown commercial company), which would issue licenses to privateers–-attorneys–-to attack American ‘vessels’ [individual commerce-based Trust accounts] in international jurisdictions of law. This was done so the Monarch could pay off debt to international bankers. The Bar Association is a private military association. Attornors act to transfer homage and fealty to or between public-estates.
To continue – When Andrew Jackson retained his presidency in 1832, he ended the existence of a central bank here. Another would not be established for over 75 years, and that would require a banker-fomented Civil War to gain the bankers more power over commerce and then their further infiltration into the workings of American government via control of politicians. President Jackson had always distrusted the Bank on the basis of it trampling states’ rights and because the structuring of the Bank did not allow effective regulation by the Congress, the president and the people. In 1833 Jackson ordered that federal deposits be removed from the national Bank and put into state banks. In 1834 the House voted against re-chartering the Second Bank of the United States, and also confirmed that federal deposits should remain in state banks. In 1835 President Jackson paid off the national debt, but he did not realize that he needed to warn the people that the danger of a central bank was the operators’ ability to control the issuance of currency.
It was not until the panic of 1907–-caused per the Venetian families’ effective strategies–-that a third central bank was instituted by congressional passage of the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. That established a Bank charter that was renewed–-due to the continuing effects of the Great Depression–-in 1933. In 1935 The Banking Act amended the Federal Reserve Act, changing its name to Federal Reserve System.
The linked video presents that 60 ancient Venetian families still exist today. The Warburg family is one of them. It was Paul Warburg who wrote the primary features of the 1913 Fed Act, based on the strategic operation of the Venetians’ oligarchical principle.
No comments:
Post a Comment